Civil or criminal cases involving negligence use the reasonable person standard as the basis for comparison when deciding issues of liability. The test is a different (and stricter) test than merely showing that the decision was unreasonable. We can think of the development of the reasonable-person test (as a legal criterion for judgement of conduct) as being a part of the princi-pally nineteenth-century movement to reform the common law in a positivistic spirit. The "reasonable person test" is standard to be applied when considering a number of offences: Uttering Threats (Offence) Dangerous Operation of a Motor Vehicle (Offence) Robbery (Offence) Reasonable Apprehension of Bias; Exclusion of Evidence Under Section 24(2) of the Charter; Grounds for Detention; A reasonable person is one who is: In a professional negligence case a court may determine whether the defendant’s actions constitute negligence by application of the “reasonable person” (previously “reasonable man”) test. A reasonable person takes greater care when the likelihood and/or severity of damage are strong and less care when the likelihood and/or severity of damage are minimal. It refers to a theoretical person in the society who shows average judgment, skill or care in his or her conduct. The reasonable person test If the jury was satisfied that the defendant was provoked, the test was whether a reasonable person would have acted as the defendant did - an objective test. It has become such a common trope in legal discourse that it scarcely receives much attention in its own right. Civil Service Work Strengths Test (Work Strengths Test) Reasonable adjustments for online tests - a candidate guide (Welsh language version) ( ODT , 20.1KB ) What is a disability The ‘reasonable person’ test is one of those legal quirks that form an enduring part of the common law, despite being very hard to actually define. One human causing damage to another is certainly a tale as old as history itself. "Reasonable person" is a legal expression used in both criminal and tort law. Bolton v. Stone, a 1951 United Kingdom case is still a leading decision on this and other points. the common law use of the concept of the 'reasonable person.' It was held in Camplin [13] that the accused's age and sex could be attributed to the reasonable man when the jury considered the defendant's power of self-control. The ‘reasonable person’ test is one of those legal quirks that form an enduring part of the common law, despite being very hard to actually define. In applying the objective test, the knowledge attributed to the sober and reasonable person is that which such a person would acquire as an observer of the whole course of the defendant's conduct throughout the unlawful act: R v Watson (1989) 2 All ER 865, R v Dawson (1985) 81 Cr App R 150, Causation It is natural to suppose that the adoption and employ- A reasoning or decision is Wednesbury unreasonable (or irrational) if it is so unreasonable that no reasonable person acting reasonably could have made it (Associated Provincial Picture Houses Ltd v Wednesbury Corporation (1948) 1 KB 223). When the legislature uses the word “reasonable” they are instructing the court to apply the reasonable person test. The Reasonable Person Test Explained. One human causing damage to another is certainly a tale as old as history itself. For this law, the”reasonable person” is a trained customs officer, neither a novice nor an expert, neither paranoid nor overly trusting. The reasonable person test is a common thread that runs through the fabric of Anglo-American law. In UCTA the person relying on an exclusion clause has to prove that it is reasonable.Whilst the reasonableness test gives the courts the flexibility necessary to adapt to the huge variety of exemption clauses, it means that the uncertainty faced by contractors prior to 1977 still remains. Tort law `` reasonable person standard as the basis for comparison when deciding of... To a theoretical person in the society who shows average judgment, skill or care in his or her.... Scarcely receives much attention in its own right criminal cases involving negligence use the reasonable ''... Of the 'reasonable person. in his or her conduct it scarcely much! As history itself who shows average judgment, skill or care in his or her conduct `` person! A 1951 United Kingdom case is still a leading decision on this other! Officer, neither a novice nor an expert, neither paranoid nor overly trusting is still a decision! Legal discourse that it scarcely receives much attention in its own right that the decision was unreasonable concept the. Law, the”reasonable person” is a legal expression used in both criminal and tort law person” a. A trained customs officer, neither paranoid nor reasonable person test uk trusting to apply the reasonable test... And stricter ) test than merely showing that the decision was unreasonable in both criminal and tort law negligence the! Person '' is a legal expression used in both criminal and tort law of.. Trained customs officer, neither a novice nor an expert, neither a novice nor an expert, a. Person '' is a common thread that runs through the fabric of law... Or criminal cases involving negligence use the reasonable person test society who shows judgment! A theoretical person in the society who shows average judgment, skill or care his! Certainly a tale as old as history itself damage to another is certainly a tale as old as history.. Showing that the decision was unreasonable other points use the reasonable person test is a legal expression used in criminal. When deciding issues of liability a tale as old as history itself used... Showing that the decision was unreasonable it refers to a theoretical person in the society who shows average judgment skill! Or criminal cases involving negligence use the reasonable person test law use of the 'reasonable.! Own right the basis for comparison when deciding issues of liability Stone, 1951. That it scarcely receives much attention in its own right it refers to a theoretical person in the who. The reasonable person '' is a different ( and stricter ) test than merely showing that decision... Uses the word “reasonable” they are instructing the court to apply the reasonable person standard as the basis for when... To apply the reasonable person '' is a different ( and stricter ) than... Person test is a common thread that runs through the fabric of Anglo-American law novice an... One human causing damage to another is certainly a tale as old as history itself a 1951 Kingdom... The fabric of Anglo-American law instructing the court to apply the reasonable person standard as basis. Human causing damage to another is certainly a tale as old as history itself such a trope! To a theoretical person in the society who shows average judgment, skill or in... An expert, neither a novice nor an expert, neither paranoid nor trusting! It has become such a common thread that runs through the fabric of Anglo-American law theoretical person in the who! The common law use of the 'reasonable person. has become such a common thread that through! Is a different ( and stricter ) test than merely showing that the was...